Where Do Indian Muslims Go From Here?

Delhi Muslim BoyFrom Moghul emperor Akbar to Bahadur Shah Zafar – the hero of India’s first war of independence, to Maulana Azad – the pre-eminent freedom fighter, to President APJ Abdul Kalam – the creator of India’s missile program and beyond, there is an illustrious unending string of Muslims who contributed substantially in the building of the Indian nation over the centuries.

The Past

In the 600 years that Muslims were in power in India most Muslim kings were moderates who held power by forming alliances of Muslims and Hindus. During the 300 year long Moghul empire it was a political alliance of Moghuls and Rajput Hindus that held power in North India. Together, they spent decades to extend their hold into South India waging continual wars against the Bahmani sultans, the Golkunda dynasty, the Qutubshahi dynasty – all of whom were Muslims.

Most Muslim rulers and their noblemen in India forsook the ethos of the West Asian nations of their origin and integrated themselves with the culture and soil of India to create the Indo-Islamic civilization. Much as in ancient times the Aryans of central Asia integrated themselves with the same Indian soil to develop the Hindu civilization.
Indian Muslims are justifiably proud of their Indo-Islamic heritage. It is a genuinely Indian civilization that the people of India belonging to different religions created by merging the culture of the Muslim immigrants from West Asia with that of the Hindus of India.

At the dawn of independence while a sizeable number of Muslims migrated to Pakistan, about 60 million at that time chose to stay in India. Without a doubt these people rejected the two nation theory, considered the formation of Pakistan a disaster for the Muslims and India, and believed in the secular and diverse milieu of India.

It can not be forgotten that a majority of Muslims in the provinces that remained in India supported Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Valabbahi Patel and Maulana Azad in their opposition to the partitioning of India.

The Present

However soon after independence in 1947 Muslims in India found themselves the victims of the backlash of the formation of Pakistan, an action that they had opposed strongly. They found themselves excluded from the mainstream and suspect in their nationalism, in the midst of people with whom they had grown up as youngsters.

Today the overwhelming majority of India’s Muslims consider being Indian as important as being Muslim. A majority of them are people who were born after independence and for whom stories of India’s partition is something that they heard from their parents. Of their own free will Muslims vote for secular parties rather than for Muslim parties and candidates, who are not secular.

The result of the last election indicates that of the about thirty Muslim members of the Indian parliament, all of whom stood from constituencies with sizeable Muslim population, only three are from Muslim parties. Muslims in India never associate with any separatists or anti-national elements. As for the Kashmir problem, it is not a Hindu-Muslim problem. It is the result of years of mismanagement by successive governments in New Delhi and Srinagar, that allowed the festering impoverishment and deprivation of Kashmiris to acquire an anti-national color.

The Despair

In-spite of their being 140 million strong and their overwhelming festering impoverishment, Muslims in India have no leadership worth its name, no coherent direction and no roadmap to break out of their sixty year old state- of- siege. The number of Indian Muslims living below poverty level has remained at 55 percent for decades, compared to the 35 percent national average. Similarly 45 percent of the Muslim community continues to be illiterate compared to 36 percent for all Indians; 55 percent of Muslim women are illiterate compared to 40 percent for all Indian women.

The blight and squalor of Muslim townships in India’s many cities reflects the contempt with which successive federal and state governments have treated the Muslim community for decades. The very acute shortage of schools, medical clinics, parks, paved roads, sanitation facilities and the large number of unemployed youth in Muslim localities is a gnawing reality. In most Muslim high schools there are either no libraries and laboratories, or they are in shambles. Despite many surveys, commissions and recommendations that successive federal and state governments have promulgated, the very poor condition of the basic civic infrastructure in Muslim townships flies in the face of the impressive modernized infrastructure in the rest of the country.

For sixty years now Muslim Dalits and Muslim OBCs, despite their impoverishment and despair, have been excluded from the purview of the government’s affirmative action plan while Hindu and Buddhist Dalits and OBCs have benefitted immensely from such plans.

For decades a variety of political parties, e.g. Congress, Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party, Communist Party of India and others that proclaim themselves as sympathetic to Muslims, have continued to exploit the Muslim community for their votes with empty and meaningless promises that have remained unfulfilled, even though waves of elections have come and gone. While these parties have given tickets to Muslim candidates for parliament and state assemblies, and some of them have won, these powerless Muslim representatives in the political infrastructure have no voice in bringing development to the Muslim townships. Over a decade ago these parties proclaimed repeatedly in UP and Bihar that Urdu – the mother tongue of Muslims in those states – will be the second language. But after more than a decade hardly any Urdu teachers have been hired for the numerous schools, and Urdu with which their heritage is directly linked continues to die.

In such circumstances it is indeed strange that some political parties and politicians often campaign on the theme that successive governments have appeased Muslims. This misleading propaganda has so charged the atmosphere that today every legitimate Muslim grievance, be it an appeal for financial relief for victims of communal violence, or basic infrastructure uplift, or better schools or preservation of Urdu, or protection of mosques and shrines, or freedom to retain their Muslim identity, is advertised by the obscurantist political forces as Muslims’ attempt to seek special privileges.

The Future

After waiting for sixty years to have political parties and others lobby for them and help resolve their problems, today the future of the Muslim community lies in taking a bold lead and seeking the active help of the majority Hindu community and the power structure. They need to calmly persuade majority Hindus that their backwardness is a national Indian problem just like the backwardness of the lower caste Hindus, and that it is not a problem of just the Muslim community.

If the Muslims are trying to retain their Indo-Islamic identity then so are all major ethnic groups in India. Punjabi Hindus have very different social practices than Tamil Hindus; Bengali Hindus have totally different social practices than the Gujarati Hindus; UP/Bihar Hindus have completely different cultural practices than the Andhra Pradesh Hindus. So why should mainstream India interpret the attempts of the Indian Muslims to retain their distinct identity as lack of integration and nationalism? Why not lend a helping hand to help break their state-of-siege?

Kaleem Kawaja is past President of Association of Indian Muslims of America (AIM), Washington DC.

Delhi Muslim Boy Picture By Baba Steve 

About Kaleem Kawaja

He lives in Washington DC where he is an engineering manager at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Goddard Space Flight Center. He is an activist in the Indian-American community and the American-Muslim community; he writes and speaks frequently on the issues of these communities. He is associated with several Indian-American community organizations including the Association of Indian Muslims of America (AIM), a Washington DC based NGO, and National Federation of Indian Associations (NFIA), where he has held leadership positions for many years. He was also the President of the Muslim Community Center, Washington DC for a couple of years and is associated with their management committee for many years.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

144 Responses to Where Do Indian Muslims Go From Here?

  1. 1conoclast says:

    Das,

    While I agree with you that hindutva is India’s enemy # 2 if not # 1, I can only watch you get it from Manish on criticising Gandhiji. And from Manoj for trying to blame an entire community for the ills of others.

    Manish,

    Peace man. The alternative to hindutva needn’t be jihadis. No need to swing from one extreme to another. The moderates have done & will continue to do a good job.

    Arun Nair,

    Will you please drop your furtive defence of modi? The man is evil in a greater way than even godse. Don’t trivialise issues like this please.

  2. Sahil Khan says:

    “Save India’s soul from the criminals and murderers of Hindutva.”
    And hand it over to jihadis?
    “Nehru’s vision brought us to this point . Let us now try Modi’s … the result would be for the historian to comment.. 60 years from now.”
    No. Let us try SIMI or LeT or Indian Mujahideen or even Al-Qaeda. They alone are capable of bringing justice to Muslims.

    Manish, Why do we all have to swing like pendulums? One extremity to another extremity.

    While partition happened under whatever circumstances let us now vouch not to create such circumstances again. If Partition had not happened or it would have happened. Lot of things are in hands of the allmighty and not in hands of us mortals. What is in our hands is to understand God. A few people in both Muslims and Hindus will always be wrong but then its for the larger sensible people to understand that our future generations will be happy in a nation that can create opportunities, that will be prosperous, in a stronger India. It need not be a Muslim India or a Hindu India. A Mughal India, A British India or a Kushana India were known across the world for their power , wealth and glory. Let us now form a powerful India by Indians. And the first step is to realise that respect each others religions. Dont fight amongst yourselves.

  3. Arun Nair says:

    > Will you please drop your furtive defence of modi? The man is evil in a greater way than even godse. Don’t trivialise issues like this please.

    It just looks like we’ll have to agree to disagree here (again!).

    There’s a concerted campaign to demonise the Hindu conservative parties of India – this is aiding, not removing, the Indian society’s divide. This applies to those who mindlessly attack congress and the communists as well.

    I propose that we see the Gujarat riots for what it really was – not any single evil person’s doing, but a specific instance of the governance decay that has set into our country. Constantly yakking about Modi’s evilness is pointless and rather wasteful of energies that are better spent in other ways. Keep in mind that we cannot write off just a portion of Modi – we have to write all of him off. Which means writing off a prominent nationalist leader who has catapulted one of India’s major states into a new era of prosperity and efficient administration.

    Hence the rational conclusion – leave his judgement to history, just as the case was for Nehru, Gandhi, Jinnah, Dalai Lama, Bhagat Singh, and Savarkar. Note how all these people are villains in some people’s books.

  4. 1conoclast says:

    Arun…

    Armed with the new-found knowledge of what you stand for, it couldn’t please me more to be in disagreement with you.

    This “concerted effort” that you speak of is more conspiracy theory than fact. According to me in a nation like India, any party that is based on religion (whether conservative Hindu or conservative Muslim or conservative Sikh) does not deserve to be in the Governance arena.
    And if unfortunately they do happen to be present, it is imperative that what they really stand for be examined by analysts, historians, the press etc.

    Up until know I had a certain image of you in mind: Intelligent, Articulate, Reasonable, pro-Peace. Your latest description of modi (and you pro-right comments on my blog) have replaced that image with one that I cannot respect but what you probably will enjoy.

    prominent nationalist leader

    WHO? modi? I can’t stop the derisive laughter that emanates from every pore of my being!!! MORE like internationally prominent mass-murderer or the more popular “merchant of death”.

    efficient administration

    Of WHAT? Rioting? So that’s what the right has been celebrating about him? I get it now!

    I quote Ranjona Banerji here:
    http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1181654&pageid=0

    She says:

    It took Gujarat a good three years to recover from the riots. Nationally and internationally, its image as an industrious, well-run state took a beating. Regardless of the hype around Modi as Gujarat’s best chief minister, history will show that Gujarat has regularly topped the charts as far as industrialisation, entrepreneurial ability and good administration are concerned. Modi took it a few steps back before it moved forward again. Several multinationals and Indian companies held back their investments in the state. It has to be remembered that the United States has consistently refused Modi a visa, a cause of significant embarrassment for those who want to forget the enormity of the 2002 riots.

    This is a respected prominent journo talking. Of course you can rubbish it by falling back upon the “concerted effort to demonize” conspiracy theory that you not so eloquently spouted, but wouldn’t I (& others) be far more comfortable relying on her than what you hurriedly punched out on your keyboard?
    The prosperity you refer to has been part of gujarat from before modi. Remember how the bjp’s “India Shining” campaign fell flat on it’s face because they were claiming credit for the ball that PVN Rao & Dr. Manmohan Singh had set rolling?
    Remember how Rahul Bajaj stood up in the IMC when modi was visiting & tore into him for sullying India’s image?
    Note how the US continues to deny the genocide perpetrator a visa; God bless their souls… someone’s thinking straight!

    I’m happy to leave his judging to History. History is fair & sees hitler, godse etc for the maniacal killers they were. However, I’d rather wait to see if modi is pronounced guilty by our Justice system as hkl bhagat & more recently madhukar sarpotdar were. THAT will be a day that History will celebrate!

    To your last argument, Gandhiji was considered for the Nobel Peace Prize on 3 occasions & was supposed to win in 1948. His assassination led to the Nobel Peace Prize not being given out that year as the prize is not awarded posthumously. His fans range from Einstein to Mandela to King. Similar is the stature of the Dalai Lama in the international community.
    Your speaking of them in the same breath as jinnah, sarvarkar & modi(!!!) is sacrilege but not surprising as your wont has already been exposed by now.

    Please remember that fans of hitler exist, and that Lincoln’s detractors existed. History at large remembers hitler as a criminal & Lincoln’s detractors & their arguments have been long forgotten. Lincoln continues to shine.
    godse continues to inspire people like me to burn his effigies on Guy Fawkes Day & encouraging the Commonwealth to do the same. The idea is there, I (& others) may make it a reality soon.
    yazid’s being a hero to some doesn’t change the opinion of the larger populace. 1400 years of History have not altered any facts about his villiany.

    WHAT makes you propound that History will judge a modi any differently?
    :-)