Judge Kode is now a household name. He rose to stardom after his verdict implicating and prosecuting the perpetrators of Bombay 1992 bomb blasts. I, as a Muslim, don’t have a soft corner for the Muslims who have been awarded sentences by the Kode. I wonder if I should have any, simply because the verdict has been incomplete without the prosecution of Hindus, the majority, and Muslims involved in the riots that followed Babri Masjid demolition.
Even though my family lost no one during the Mumabi riots, the feeling of hatred towards Thackeray and his party members was apparent. Thackeray became a symbol of evil for Muslims. Curses were thrown at random at him during conversations. The feeling of alienation was growing in my locality, predominantly Muslim, and people were looking to migrate to Gulf or the West. And then came the bomb blasts that ripped the city apart. Many saw this as revenge for the riots that killed so many Muslims.
My aunt even remarked, “Waise to Dawud Jannah me jaiga nahi lekin shayad iske iss kaarnaame ke baad use thodi reyayat mil jaye qayamat ke din” (It’s difficult for Dawud to get heaven on the day of judgement but I hope he gains some good deeds after this bomb blast). Such harsh words from my aunt did capture the mentality of Muslims at that time.
We have always struggled to establish our loyalties with this country on account of being relatives of Pakistanis and anti-Muslim riots keeps reminding us that we did commit a *mistake* by not migrating to Pakistan! The connivance of police, politicians and our neighbourhood in unleashing the savage attack on our mothers/sisters/children keeps the fire of animosity bright. Its not that Hindus don’t suffer in the riots but its just that Hindus don’t have to prove their allegiance to India because Hindus are in majority here. The situation is the same for a Hindu in Pakistan or Bangladesh. Muslims are labelled traitors because there is concept of Ummah and there are 56 or so Muslim countries where we can be accommodated.
The Gujarat riots also contributed the existing divide among the 2 communities. Once again Modi became a symbol of hatred. His supporters in public and police made sure Muslims are taught a good lesson after the Godhra incident, punishing the whole community for crime by few. When Gujarat was burning in 2002, so were the heats of millions of Muslim across this country. The trust in the government was fast fading away. The frustration at being targets again and again was forcing people to migrate to safer lands. Ghettos were expanding at exponential rates. There was at atmosphere of animosity existing among all localities in the country. Muslims are often accused of hampering India’s economic growth on account of illiteracy and religion but what about security? If Muslim businesses are destroyed in every one of these riots then what do you expect from the business men? To start each time again? And this problem assumes greater significance as majority of Muslims are self employed. Many businesses even change name to make it look secular or Hindu so as to prevent the loss during riots.
So what’s the similarity between these riots or perhaps many more of them? The perpetrators, who are majority Hindus, are never punished. Its not about people like Modi or Thackeray or Advani or Togadia, but its about people like Babu Bajrangi. I understand that men/women of influence in India can never be prosecuted just because there is always the Supreme court which can drag cases till the end of their lives and I am not even asking for their trials. These men of account of their power can always shield the chintu/pintu of crowd who torched Muslim families to death. I have always believed that riots give a free hand to sexually frustrated men to vent out their frustration, I wonder how they manage to settle back into their own families.
Another similarity between these is the Babri Masjid. I wonder how many Mosques and graves have been brought down to save just this Masjid. I really don’t know if its a better idea to give this to the RSS brigade as this would incite lot of passions and most importantly it would make the demands of RSS on other lands more audacious. But its definitely a good idea to forgive the Hindus who took parts in the riots. Just because its the need of the hour. India has already suffered a lot because of this feeling of vengeance. Any further quenching of this thirst would create a precarious situation which is definitely not conducive for peace to exist. I see no immediate action on the Srikrishna report and rest be assured that even if the judicial process is to start, it would last so long that the perpetrators would have died naturally by then.
There is a great rewards in forgiveness. Remember how Abu Jahal was forgiven by our beloved prophet. When Umar (May Allah be pleased with him), the second caliph of Islam, forgave his killer. He was killed by a Persian slave but there were no mass murders of Persians after that. In the Qur’an Allah has described the Believers as “those who avoid major sins and acts of indecencies and when they are angry they forgive.” (ash-Shura 42: 37) Later in the same Surah Allah says, “The reward of the evil is the evil thereof, but whosoever forgives and makes amends, his reward is upon Allah.” (al-Shura 42: 40) In another place the Qur’an says, “If you punish, then punish with the like of that wherewith you were afflicted. But if you endure patiently, indeed it is better for the patient. Endure you patiently. Your patience is not except through the help of Allah.” (an-Nahl:126-127).
This is an excellent article on forgiveness.
If it help our nation get out the of vicious circle of hatred then why not? I understand it takes a lot to forgive particularly by the family of those affected but is the fire of vengeance helping things? Remember there is day of judgement even.
dude,
relax, try to think impartially – and stop moralizing.
http://offstumped.nationalinterest.in/2007/08/05/justice-srikrishna-commission-report-media-myths-and-reality/
the riots werent *just* hindu-killing-muslims. it was vice-versa in significant numbers too. it was mob behavior. sure some policemen were biased etc. but if u actually ended up saying that pakistan *might* have been a better alternative, you have lost all my respect.
hope you dont consor this
peace.
Pingback: University Update - Supreme Court - Shall we forgive the killers?
Sure, we can forgive but people need to ask for forgiveness. If the person think what he did was right then he will continue to do that and our forgiving them will matter little to them.
Indians who are demanding that Srikrishna report be implemented then all they are asking for is justice. Not revenge, if it was revenge these people would have been killed long ago as these perpetrators of heinous crimes against humanity continue to live and move about freely. Their identity is not a secret.
Undoubtedly justice is not something I’d compromise. if one wants to forgive, its one’s personal decision. however, the nation state of india must bring to justice everyone who took law into their own hands. however, I don’t think this is a hindu muslim issue at all. its about having a police (and judicial) system that works. police reforms (and i don’t mean reservations) is critical. besides riots are two way, not one way. so who should forgive who? not everyone believes in judgement day. i believe in justice now.
Forgiveness is important,but so is justice.
i for one,so far,cant think,pakistan could be a better choice.
The kind of violence,corruption and the lack of proper practising muslims there,doesnt make it an appealing place to me.
i think we have a different cultures.
Surely a keralite muslim can never feel at home there.-).
So,i guess,we have to fight for our justice,and for our rights,in our land.-india.
Forgiveness is no doubt an honorable act that is recommended by Quran and Hadith. Allah commands:
‘Show forgiveness, enjoin what is good, and turn away from the foolish (i.e., don’t punish them).’ (Quran,Al-A’raf 7:199),
The Prophet also advised in so many hadith that repressing anger is the real strength and bravery. I would like to quote a couple of them:
“Whoever suppresses his anger at the time when he could express it openly, Allah will fill his heart with contentment on the Day of Resurrection.� (Reported by al-Tabaraani, 12/453; Saheeh al-Jaami’, 176).
“Shall I not tell you who is stronger than him? A man who is mistreated by another, but suppresses his anger, has defeated his own shaytan and the shaytan of the one who mistreated him.� (Reported by al-Bazzaar. Ibn Hajar said that its isnaad is hasan. Al-Fath, 10/519).
At the same time, you should be clear that you can only repress anger when you have freedom to express it. I think the forgiveness and repressing anger is relevant in cases when people insult you as a Muslim or your religion due to their ignorance. You can easily give a harsh reply or insult their religion but you restrain as this is why your religion commands.
As far as forgiveness of crimes is concerned, forgiveness is preferred over punishment but that forgiveness should come from the victims or their family members. Their forgiveness is also relevant when in the absence of the same, the guilty is punished. Now tell me where is any guilty going to be punished so how does the question for forgiveness arises? This is nothing but self-satisfying interpretation of the concept of forgiveness. You cannot punish the guilty or see hope of their punishment, this is why you are talking of forgiveness.
The right religious value that comes in play in this context is that of ‘patience’. The two values that Quran emphasizes the most are ‘patience’ and ‘humility’. Allah promises trials to all Muslims, the trials are worst for the people that are better in religion. We should stay patient in the times when there are such trials and afflictions. Allah promises trials but also gives hope to those who are patient:
‘And most certainly shall We try you by means of danger, and hunger, and loss of worldly goods, of lives and of [labour's] fruits. But give glad tidings unto those who are patient in adversity’ (Quran, Sura Baqra: 2:155)
There have been worst trials with the most pious men in Islamic history. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was humiliated, his relatives killed, he children and wife Khadija died, he was attacked badly in Taif by stones that he was bled all over, even after all these he was patient. He did not seek revenge for any of these crimes. When he was attacked in Taif, the angle Gibraeel saught his permission to turn the city upside down but the Prophet (peace be upon him) refused and forgave the culprits. Many great scholars of Islam were punished severely because they refused to obey the rulers to interpret religion in their favour.
So, the talk of forgiveness is baseless as there is no punishment that you can foresee, however, we should be patient and should not seek revenge through unlawful means as that’s prohibited in religion too. If there is punishment for the guilty through lawful means, we should support it by all means.
Maybe we should also talk about the horrible killings of Hindus in the Moplah rebellion. We have already forgiven the killers.